Проведено систематизований ретроспективний аналітичний огляд вирізнених чотирьох європейських і вітчизняних концепцій ідентифікації міри антропізації ландшафтів, а саме концепцій архіретроспективного (природності), созологічно-ідеалізованого (незайманості), актуально-потенційного (гемеробності) та геокологічно-природокористувального аналізу. Визначено принципи та підходи до обгрунтування та наступної реалізації методики аналізу міри антропізації ландшафтів України, якій буде притаманна загальноєвропейська інтероперабельність.
Проведен систематизированный ретроспективный аналитический обзор выделенных четырех европейских и отечественных концепций идентификации меры антропизации ландшафтов, а именно концепций архиретроспективного (естественности), созологично-идеализированного (нетронутости), актуально-потенциального (хемеробности) и геоэколого-природопользовательского анализа. Определены принципы и подходы к обоснованию и последующей реализации методики анализа меры антропизации ландшафтов Украины, которой будет свойственна общеевропейская интероперабельность.
There was implemented classified retrospective analytic survey of differentiated four European and home conceptions for identification of landscapes" anthropization extent. This survey is &based on more than 110 representative primary sources and mentioned conceptions are conceptions of archiretrospective (naturalness), sozological-idealized (wilderness), actual-potential (hemeroby) and geoecological-naturemanagement analysis. Consider&ing proper actual geoinformation basis, which is available for verification and realization, conceptions of hemeroby (actual-potential) and geoecological-nature-management analysis are for the present the most applicable and opened for their further &improving modification including possible integration of these conceptions concerning the landscape and land use peculiarities of Ukraine. There were defined principles and/or approaches to foundation and future realization of procedure for analysis &of Ukrainian landscapes" anthropization extent, which will have all-European interoperability. The first of such principles is synergetic combination of all useful achievements of mentioned two conceptions including interoperable aspect. The second a&pproach expects application of such model-parametric tool for anthropization assessment as classified scheme of landscapes" anthropization extent depending on anthropogenic impact" extent of land use systems and corresponding to this scheme average-w&eighted by proper areas index of anthropization. The tool of the third approach is index of proportion for geoecological favorable land use systems (nature-accentuated or near-to-nature systems) and opposite to them geoecological unfavorable systems.& Both the second and the third approaches identify landscape anthropization as the process of their generation and/or transformation through anthropogenic impact with specific intensity and consequences of this process as existence of different level& anthropizated landscapes. The fourth principle expects the creation of new scale of anthropization extent for Ukraine based on comparative analysis of foreign and home experience for connection of anthropogenic impact"s definite intensity with deter&mined land use systems or land cover systems as systems of land use consequences. This scale has to be nonlinear parameterized.
