Статтю присвячено дослідженню окремих проблемних питань кримінальних
правовідносин не лише шляхом інтерпретації класичного вчення про злочин та склад злочину, а й через призму новітніх досліджень кримінально-правового конфлікту.
Paradoxically, frequent amendments to domestic criminal law did not do it better and therefore more effective. The problem, as we see it, not only unreasonably large numbers
listed in the matter of criminal law changes, but primarily in their quality, which is still clearly low. We are deeply convinced that it is necessary to move away from the numerous «cosmetic» changes and look at the problem of inefficiency (imperfections) domestic criminal law is much deeper and different perspective, namely reviewing and overestimating some of its conceptual provisions (including classical theory of the crime and crime as the only reason to criminal liability, etc.). In particular, even a preliminary analysis suggests that the doctrine of the crime has a number of obvious flaws and shortcomings. In particular, focus only 4 pravozastosuvacha necessarily formal elements (object – the objective side – subject – subjective side) leads to the fact that it distracted from the important fact: most of these phenomena on the one hand, due& to previous events, on the other – they do not remain static, and thus acquire its further development.
Статья посвящена исследованию отдельных проблемных вопросов уголовных правоотношений не только путем интерпретации классического учения о престу&плении и составе преступления, но и через призму новейших bсследований уголовно-правового конфликта.
