У статті трагічні події на українському Сході розглядаються крізь призму філософсько-дискурсивного аналізу. Це дає можливість побачити їх як жахливе співпадання обставин, яких могло б і не бути, які могли б і не співпасти. Сьогодні слово "Україна" для всього світу звучить з однаковим семантичним відтінком - гео-центр Європи, в якому відбуваються неймовірні, небачені раніше речі, речі такого плану, що у попередніх поняттях і категоріях не піддаються раціональній рефлексії. Зазначене підвищує роль філософсько-дискурсивного аспекту в аналізі цієї проблеми, під кутом зору якого жахлива українська трагедія постає водночас як кривава рана на тілі українського соціального організму.
Philosophical and discursive analysis of the bloody events in the UkrainianEast is made. It gives the possibility to consider them as a terrible set of circumstances which, in principle, could not be matched. Nowadays the word "Ukraine" sounds to the world with the same semantic nuances - geo-center of Europe, in which incredible and unprecedented events are happening that couldn"t be brought to rational reflection under previous concepts and categories. Hence this powerful flow of word formation - a hybrid war, cyborgs, information attack, etc. The Ukrainian East has beco&me a geo-point where extremely high and extremely ugly, earthly and heavenly, previously unheard elements of barbarism, cynicism, cruelty, treachery and unprecedented manifestations of humanity, patriotism, the highest and the most noble human virtue&s are overlapped and linked. This geo-point symbolizes the "crossroads" which anthropologists considered as a crucial stage in the evolution of mankind when there are two ways - the first is up (God likeliness) and the second is down (fall). Aforesai&d analysis raises the philosophical aspect of this problem. The role of special scientific studies is still important. However, the individual instruments of a scientist are limited enough. He must operate with narrow methodological means. Philosophy& can and should reflex over various theories as its tools, collate and compare different discourses, finding in this way the true. Under this perspective the terrible Ukrainian tragedy appears as a bloody wound on the body of the Ukrainian social org&anism, as a test of the fourth Ukrainian state formation wave, as a result of clash of civilizations, as a crucial trajectory point of mankind"s cyclical progress and even as a culmination moment in the articulation of the myth about older and younge&r brother. To find the way out of this terrible geo-point we can not reject any discourse because, as Descartes said in his time, the truth can be contained just there.
