У статті визначається сутність понять "прямий" і "перехресний" допит свідків і потерпілих. Аналізується проблема участі обвинуваченого (підсудного) в "прямому" і "перехресному" допиті свідків і потерпілих на підставі положень міжнародних конвенцій та практики Європейського суду з прав людини та наводиться висновок, що обвинувачений, оскільки він належить до сторони захисту, повинен мати право, навіть за наявності захисника, прийняти участь у допиті свідків і потерпілих.
В статье определяется сущность понятий прямой и перекрестный допрос свидетелей и потерпевших. Анализируется проблема участия обвиняемого (подсудимого) в прямом и перекрестном допросе свидетелей и потерпевших на основании положений международных конвенций, практики Европейского суда поправам человека. Обвиняемый, поскольку он принадлежит к стороне защиты, должен иметь право, даже при наличии защитника, принять участие в допросе свидетелей и потерпевших.
The article defined the essence of the terms «direct» and «cross examination of witnesses and victims. It is noted that during the trial examination of witnesses have not used the free form of presentation is indicated, but the answers to the questions, and offer a free presentation about the presiding evidence applies only quest&ioning the accused. Prosecutors and defense counsel in the trial of criminal proceedings to ensure performance of their judicial functions of prosecution and defense special attention should be paid to the observance of procedural order, the correct &strategy and tactics of direct and cross-examination of witnesses and victims, as in the wider use of elements of
competition under the new Code of Ukraine are more likely to receive from the person being questioned necessary information to verify t&he legal positions of the parties. It is noted that the court does not conduct questioning, but only monitors compliance with the rules of its implementation by the parties. The judge may, in protest parties take matters which do not concern the meri&ts of the criminal proceedings and in case of ambiguity in the testimony of a witness, victim regarding the presence or absence of particular circumstances, to require the witness to a clear answer to the question – "yes" or "no", but ask your questi&ons and the presiding judge can only after the witness put the question victim, civil plaintiff, civil defendant, their representatives and legal representatives or other evidence in the study. The problem of participation of the accused (defendant) &in the "direct" and "cross the interrogation of witnesses and victims under the provisions of international conventions and European Court of Human Rights and is a conclusion that the defendant, as it relates to the defense shall have the right, even& in the presence of counsel, to take part in the questioning of witnesses and victims.
